
Bitget-CEO Gracy Chen hatte zuvor gegenüber Cointelegraph erklärt, dass es sich um Geschäfte zwischen einzelnen Marktteilnehmern handelte.

Finanzmittel Info + Krypto + Geld + Gold
Krypto minen, NFT minten, Gold schürfen und Geld drucken

Bitget-CEO Gracy Chen hatte zuvor gegenüber Cointelegraph erklärt, dass es sich um Geschäfte zwischen einzelnen Marktteilnehmern handelte.

Strategy kauft mehr Bitcoin, als Miner im Monat produzieren, wie der Autor Adam Livingston erklärte.
The 1inch Network token (1INCH) has seen an impressive 15% surge over the past week, reaching $0.2089 as of April 28, 2025.
According to CoinMarketCap data, this includes a nearly 4% spike in the past 24 hours.
It’s an upward movement that aligns with a broader crypto market recovery, currently seeing Bitcoin (BTC) hover above a key level.
As 1inch price looks to break higher, other altcoins such as Casper are rallying.
Meanwhile, BTC is bidding for an uptick towards $100k – the psychological level that could buoy altcoins in the short term.
Currently, Bitcoin price sits around $95,218, up 1.9% in the past 24 hours and nearly 10% in the past week.
With the overall market sentiment seeing bulls take charge, it’s altcoins like 1INCH that could ride a wave of positive momentum to go parabolic.
As noted above, 1inch price has traded higher amid Bitcoin’s spike to above $95k.
It’s an overall outlook that could continue to dictate bulls’ performance.
However, a likely key driver behind 1INCH’s price surge is the strategic moves by 1inch’s Investment Fund.
According to Spot On Chain, the fund recently rotated profits from Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) into $1INCH.
The fund has sold 70.76 WBTC for 6.68 million USDC and then used 1.05M USDC to buy back 5.23 million 1INCH at the average buy price of $0.199.
This move signals strong confidence in 1INCH’s future value, especially given the fund’s historical success in trading its own token. Previously, 1inch achieved a 118% profit from trading.
Additional tailwinds for 1INCH may have come from 1inch’s announcement of a new mobile wallet feature.
This recent update, which enhances web3 accessibility, might be a key driver of 1inch adoption, increasing demand for the native 1INCH token.
From a technical perspective, 1INCH shows promising signs for continued growth.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) currently sits around 65, indicating that the token is nearing overbought territory but still has room before hitting extreme levels above 80.
This suggests sustained buying pressure, though traders should watch for potential pullbacks if RSI climbs higher.

Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) displays a bullish crossover.
As can be seen in the chart above, the MACD line is above the signal line and has a positive histogram, reinforcing the upward trend.
The price is also hugging the upper Bollinger Band. Based on this, $1INCH could target $0.24 in the short term, a level it previously reached in 2024. If this happens, bulls may eye new highs.
However, if overbought conditions trigger profit-taking, a dip to $0.18 might occur as a key support level.
The post 1INCH price up 15% as BTC gains: what’s driving 1inch higher? appeared first on CoinJournal.

Saylors Signal kommt eine Woche, nachdem Strategy letzte Woche 555 Millionen US-Dollar in BTC gekauft hatte.
Nike is facing a $5 million class-action lawsuit that claims the company misled investors by promoting non-fungible tokens (NFTs) tied to its RTFKT platform before abruptly shutting it down.
Filed in Brooklyn federal court on 25 April, the lawsuit accuses Nike of orchestrating a “rug pull” by heavily marketing its sneaker-themed NFTs, encouraging investment, and then closing the platform in January 2025.
The case highlights growing tensions over the classification of NFTs as securities and comes amid a sharp downturn in NFT market value, with total sales plunging 63% year-on-year in the first quarter.
The class-action group, led by Jagdeep Cheema, alleges that Nike used its brand recognition and marketing strength to promote NFTs that functioned as unregistered securities.
According to the lawsuit, Nike encouraged purchases by linking the value of the NFTs to the company’s ongoing promotional efforts, leading investors to expect rising asset values tied directly to the brand’s success.
The complaint argues that investors suffered “significant damages” after Nike shuttered RTFKT, destroying the tokens’ value. The suit also claims that Nike violated consumer protection and state competition laws.
It seeks $5 million in damages, citing breaches related to marketing unregistered securities and failing to safeguard investors’ interests after shutting down RTFKT.
Notably, the case highlights the legal uncertainty surrounding NFTs.
Although a United States court has yet to definitively rule on whether NFTs are securities, OpenSea, a major NFT marketplace, argued in an April 9 letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission that NFTs should not fall under securities regulation.
Despite this broader debate, the plaintiffs contend that the court does not need to settle the securities status of NFTs to rule on Nike’s alleged wrongdoing.
Nike acquired RTFKT Studios, a virtual sneaker and collectibles firm, in 2021.
Following the acquisition, Nike released the “CryptoKick” NFT collection, which initially traded at an average price of 3.5 Ether (around $8,000) when listed on OpenSea on 18 April 2022.
However, after Nike shuttered RTFKT in January 2025, the average price of these NFTs dropped dramatically.
By 21 April, Nike’s CryptoKick tokens were trading for around 0.009 Ether, or roughly $16.
The lawsuit argues that this collapse in value directly harmed investors who bought NFTs expecting future participation in RTFKT’s challenges and quests, a key component marketed as a reason to invest in the tokens.
The plaintiffs claim that the closure removed promised utility features that underpinned the NFTs’ value proposition, leaving investors without access to previously promoted opportunities for rewards and engagement.
The downturn in Nike’s NFT values occurred alongside a broader slump in the NFT market.
Data shows that global NFT sales dropped to $1.5 billion from January to March 2025, marking a 63% fall compared to $4.1 billion in the same quarter of 2024.
This contraction reflects a growing scepticism among investors about the long-term value of NFTs, particularly projects closely tied to brand-driven hype.
Nike’s situation adds to a series of controversies that are challenging assumptions about the sustainability of digital asset markets.
While debates around the regulatory classification of NFTs continue, cases like the Nike lawsuit may test new legal arguments without waiting for formal rulings on securities law status.
The post Nike sued for $5 million over RTFKT NFTs: check key details appeared first on CoinJournal.