‘Crypto’s here to stay’: Coinbase CEO Armstrong touts S&P 500 entry, optimistic on stablecoin law

  • Coinbase CEO is “optimistic” about Senate passing stablecoin legislation soon, despite recent setbacks.
  • A key Senate vote on the bill failed last week due to Democratic concerns, including potential benefits for Trump.
  • Coinbase is set to join the S&P 500, a move Armstrong calls a sign “crypto’s here to stay.”

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong conveyed a sense of hope on Wednesday regarding the potential passage of landmark stablecoin legislation in the US Senate, possibly as early as this week.

His remarks came even as the bill faces significant headwinds and recent setbacks that have compelled lawmakers to intensify their negotiations.

Speaking to Yahoo Finance from Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Armstrong struck an upbeat tone. “I’m actually pretty optimistic this bill can get done,” he stated.

“There’s a lot of urgency on both sides of the aisle to see this come to fruition.”

This optimism persists despite a high-profile vote on the long-awaited legislation collapsing last week.

The breakdown occurred after some Democratic senators raised concerns about how President Trump and his family might potentially benefit from the proposed rules for stablecoins – cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value by being pegged to other assets, typically the US dollar.

The path to regulation has been anything but smooth.

Beyond the specific concerns regarding potential benefits for prominent figures, other objections have surfaced, spanning anti-money laundering (AML) provisions, consumer protection measures, and questions about whether individuals close to government officials should be permitted to own or profit from these digital assets.

This confluence of concerns led to a scheduled vote last Thursday failing to secure the necessary 60 votes for passage in the full Senate.

Crypto’s mainstream push and Coinbase’s milestone

The stakes are undeniably high for the cryptocurrency industry, which views the stablecoin bill, alongside a separate market structure bill also under consideration, as crucial steps toward broader mainstream acceptance and a more favorable regulatory environment in Washington.

Interestingly, President Trump himself has advocated for new regulations in the sector while also actively participating in it through various financial ventures.

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, stands as a prime example of crypto’s increasing integration into traditional finance.

In a significant marker of this acceptance, the company is slated to join the prestigious S&P 500 index on Monday, replacing Discover, which was recently acquired by Capital One.

Armstrong sees this as a pivotal moment: “Coinbase joining the S&P 500 means crypto’s here to stay,” he asserted.

It’s going to be in everybody’s 401(k). Everyone’s going to have crypto exposure at least indirectly through Coinbase. And it’s also a symbol that crypto is updating the financial system.

The tug-of-war: industry interests and regulatory concerns

The legislative push for stablecoins is not without its detractors and competing interests.

The US banking industry has been actively lobbying to ensure the bill does not create loopholes that would allow crypto firms to offer bank-like products without adhering to the rigorous regulations imposed on traditional banks.

A key point of contention is their demand for language explicitly preventing US stablecoin issuers and intermediaries from offering interest to customers on their holdings.

Armstrong pushed back against this specific restriction, arguing that the bill should not prohibit the payment of interest on stablecoin assets and emphasizing the need for a level playing field for competition.

“We believe that, you know, the government shouldn’t really be doing protectionism for one industry versus another,” Armstrong said.

They should publish clear rules and have a level playing field for competition.

He also expressed hope that anti-money laundering laws would not be excessively expanded to encompass non-financial services like decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

Addressing the possibility of traditional banks issuing their own stablecoins should the legislation permit it, Armstrong maintained an open stance.

“Crypto is a technology to update the financial system, and we want every bank, fintech company, every payment company to be integrated,” he remarked, indicating that he believes all entities should have the ability to create stablecoins.

Looking further ahead, Armstrong envisioned a future where “the majority of all payments in the economy at some point will be running on stablecoin rails.”

Regarding Coinbase’s own operational strategy, Armstrong indicated that the company is unlikely to apply for a banking license under the current legislative proposals, as it would not be a requirement.

“We don’t have any need to or desire to pursue that,” he explained.

But obviously if something were to change in the law, we could always consider that.

The post ‘Crypto’s here to stay’: Coinbase CEO Armstrong touts S&P 500 entry, optimistic on stablecoin law appeared first on CoinJournal.

Crypto.com gets green light in Canada with restricted dealer registration

  • This regulatory milestone enables the platform to continue offering crypto asset products and services across the country.
  • The company is working toward getting its registration as an investment dealer and membership with the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO).
  • The company was the first crypto trading platform to sign a Pre-registration Undertaking with the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Crypto.com Canada announced today, that it has received restricted dealer registration in all provinces and territories of Canada.

This regulatory milestone enables the platform to continue offering crypto asset products and services across the country as it works toward registration as an investment dealer and membership with the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO).

The company was the first crypto trading platform to sign a Pre-registration Undertaking with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the Ontario Securities Commission in August 2022.

Since then, it has collaborated with Canadian securities regulators to fulfill the criteria required for restricted dealer registration.

Eric Anziani, President and Chief Operating Officer at Crypto.com, said:

“We have invested heavily in our compliance infrastructure around the world, and specifically in relation to Canada, because we want our customers to have greater peace of mind knowing that they are dealing with a regulated firm in Canada.”

Crypto.com Custody Trust Company, a non-depository trust company licensed by the New Hampshire Banking Department, will serve as the primary custodian for the digital assets of Crypto.com’s Canadian users.

“We look forward to providing secure custody services to the Canadian market and to registered cryptocurrency trading platforms that operate in line with the high standards set by Canadian securities regulators,” said Joe Anzures, President of Crypto.com Custody Trust Company.

The restricted dealer registration granted to Crypto.com Canada on May 8, 2025, adds to the company’s growing portfolio of regulatory approvals worldwide.

The firm’s global compliance framework now includes a MiCA license in the European Union, US Money Transmitter Licenses, Designated Contract Market and Derivatives Clearing Organization licenses in the US, a Major Payment Institution license in Singapore, a UK Electronic Money Institution license, and a Virtual Asset Service Provider license in Dubai.

The post Crypto.com gets green light in Canada with restricted dealer registration appeared first on CoinJournal.

Crypto news today: stablecoin bill hits political wall as democrats question Trump’s crypto ventures

  • A bipartisan stablecoin bill (GENIUS Act) faces Senate roadblocks due to Democratic concerns over Trump’s crypto ties.
  • Democrats cite Trump’s memecoin, stablecoin involvement, and potential Binance stake as raising conflict-of-interest issues.
  • Nine Senate Democrats (including previous supporters) now oppose the bill’s current form, demanding stronger safeguards.

What recently appeared as a rare opportunity for bipartisan agreement on cryptocurrency regulation has hit a significant roadblock, directly attributable to President Donald Trump’s expanding personal and business entanglements within the digital asset space.

Congressional Democrats, citing concerns over potential conflicts of interest and personal enrichment, are now expressing strong reservations about advancing landmark stablecoin legislation, jeopardizing its path forward.

The legislation in question, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins of 2025 (GENIUS Act), successfully cleared the Senate Banking Committee in March with support from both parties, signaling a potential quick win for the crypto industry seeking regulatory clarity.

However, momentum has stalled as scrutiny intensifies over President Trump’s various crypto endeavors.

These activities include the pre-inauguration launch of his own $TRUMP meme coin, reported involvement with a new stablecoin (USD1) via the Trump family-backed World Liberty Financial, suggestions of a potential family stake in the major exchange Binance (linked to an Abu Dhabi investment deal using USD1), and a partnership between the Trump Media & Technology Group and Crypto.com.

Furthermore, an upcoming dinner exclusively for top holders of his meme coin has drawn criticism, reportedly even raising eyebrows among crypto-supportive Republicans like Senator Cynthia Lummis.

Democrats pump brakes on stablecoin bill

This backdrop prompted nine Senate Democrats, including notable figures who previously voted for the bill in committee, to issue a statement over the weekend declaring they would not support the GENIUS Act in its current form.

While their official statement highlighted necessary improvements – citing the need for “stronger provisions on anti-money laundering, foreign issuers, national security, preserving the safety and soundness of our financial system, and accountability” – other prominent Democrats linked their opposition more directly to the President’s actions.

“Since the committee vote, president Trump’s aggressive efforts to profit from stablecoins and the obvious opportunities for bribery and other influence peddling have demonstrated why it is vital that we make meaningful, substantive reforms to the bill,” stated Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading voice on the Banking Committee, in a Monday speech.

Pushback extends beyond stablecoin specifics

The resistance reflects a growing unease among Democrats about potentially legitimizing or facilitating activities they perceive as problematic.

The concern isn’t necessarily directed at stablecoin regulation itself – the senators’ statement acknowledged that “the absence of regulation leaves consumers unprotected.”

Rather, the opposition targets the current legislative vehicle in the specific context of the President’s apparent conflicts.

Democrats appear unwilling to lower regulatory guardrails or advance crypto legislation that could be seen as enabling potential corruption at the highest level.

Further underscoring this sentiment, Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley introduced the “End Crypto Corruption Act” on Tuesday.

This proposed legislation aims specifically to prohibit the president and other high-ranking federal officials from issuing, sponsoring, or endorsing digital assets.

“Currently, people who wish to cultivate influence with the president can enrich him personally by buying cryptocurrency he owns or controls,” Merkley asserted in a statement accompanying the bill’s introduction.

Implications for broader crypto regulation

The impasse over the stablecoin bill casts a shadow over prospects for more comprehensive crypto market structure legislation, something the industry has sought for years.

The political friction generated by the President’s crypto ties makes navigating any crypto-related bill more challenging.

Representative Maxine Waters, the leading Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, also signaled resistance this week, objecting to a joint hearing intended to address these broader market structure issues.

Financial policy analyst Jaret Seiberg of TD Cowen viewed the situation primarily through a political lens, noting that Trump’s personal stake complicates Democratic support for a bill potentially regulating his family’s business interests.

However, he still predicted the stablecoin bill could eventually pass, potentially after Democrats extract significant concessions, given the crypto lobby’s considerable political influence and resources.

Industry lobbyists, meanwhile, appear concerned by the stalling momentum, issuing statements urging lawmakers to move the GENIUS Act forward to provide necessary regulatory clarity, support stablecoin adoption, and maintain US leadership in the digital economy.

The immediate future of the stablecoin bill, however, now appears hostage to the political fallout from the President’s controversial foray into the crypto world.

The post Crypto news today: stablecoin bill hits political wall as democrats question Trump’s crypto ventures appeared first on CoinJournal.

MOVE token plunges to all-time low after Coinbase delisting and market-making controversy

  • Coinbase has announced it will delist MOVE amid a $38M token dump controversy.
  • MOVE price has hit a record low, down 84% from the December 2024 peak.
  • Movevent Labs co-founder Rushi Manche has been suspended amid a governance and audit probe.

The MOVE token of the Ethereum-based Movement Network has tumbled to unprecedented depths following Coinbase’s announcement of its imminent delisting on May 15, 2025.

In the wake of allegations regarding a $38 million token dump and questionable market-making arrangements, the exchange has placed MOVE in limit-only mode before deciding it no longer met its listing criteria.

The market-making scandal

Coinbase’s decision to suspend all new trades came after internal documents revealed that Movement Labs had signed a market-making agreement granting undue influence to a third-party middleman.

The agreement, tying Web3Port and an obscure firm named Rentech, allegedly provided Rentech with the right to dump significant quantities of MOVE once the token’s fully diluted valuation hit $5 billion.

Shortly after MOVE made its exchange debut, Rentech executed a rapid sell-off that triggered a precipitous price collapse, eroding investor confidence within hours.

Movement Labs responded by establishing a $38 million reserve fund to repurchase the offloaded tokens, but critics have pointed out that no tangible buyback actions have materialised to date.

Binance further escalated the crisis by freezing funds linked to the same market maker, compounding concerns about the project’s governance and transparency.

Amid these developments, Movement Labs suspended co-founder Rushi Manche on May 2 while an independent review led by intelligence firm Groom Lake remains ongoing.

Manche has publicly distanced himself from the token dump, claiming bad actors manipulated agreements behind the scenes and rejecting any personal involvement in off-market sales.

Despite these assurances, the sudden leadership upheaval only deepened the aura of uncertainty surrounding MOVE’s strategic direction and governance reforms.

MOVE token hit hard

Following Coinbase’s May 1 limit-only notice and the formal delisting announcement, MOVE’s price plunged by over 20% to an all-time low near $0.18, before rebounding to $0.1985 at press time

Source: CoinMarketCap

The token is trading more than 86% below its December 2024 peak of $1.45, illustrating how project-specific turmoil can eclipse broader market rallies.

At press time, MOVE’s market capitalisation stood at approximately $496.27 million, with a staggering 398.04% spike in 24-hour trading volume and a volume-to-market-cap ratio exceeding 116.66%.

The token’s circulating supply of 2.5 billion MOVE and a total cap of 10 billion have drawn attention to potential sell-pressure vulnerabilities amid thin liquidity.

Technical indicators offer little respite, as both the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) continue their descent without signalling any bullish divergence or imminent reversal.

In Elliott wave terms, MOVE appears to be in the extended fifth wave of its downward cycle, suggesting further downside could be reached if the 1.61 extension target of $0.136 is met.

Community sentiment has soured markedly, with Telegram discussions oscillating between relief at avoiding further losses and outright accusations of yet another crypto scam.

A Movement Network Foundation spokesman emphasised that the suspension was not permanent and that talks with Coinbase are ongoing, aiming to restore trading if standards are met.

However, the delay of the promised MoveDrop airdrop and the absence of a concrete timeline for the strategic reserve’s deployment have left many token holders sceptical.

With holders numbering roughly 33,850 and the fully diluted valuation still hovering near $1.98 billion, stakeholders face a steep uphill battle to regain trust.

As Movement Labs navigates governance audits, buyback pledges, and potential reinstatement on major exchanges, MOVE’s future hinges on transparent accountability and tangible remediation.

Only by addressing the structural flaws exposed by the market-making scandal and delivering on recovery commitments can Movement hope to salvage its token’s credibility and value.

The post MOVE token plunges to all-time low after Coinbase delisting and market-making controversy appeared first on CoinJournal.

Coinbase urges US Supreme Court to rethink digital privacy doctrine

  • The crypto exchange urged the Court to reconsider the “third-party doctrine” as it applies to digital financial data.
  • While Coinbase is not a direct party to the case, the company has a vested interest in how the Court interprets privacy protections.
  • The Supreme Court is expected to decide later this year whether to hear the case.

Coinbase, alongside several states, technology firms, and advocacy groups, is calling on the US Supreme Court to revisit long-standing digital privacy standards that critics say no longer reflect the realities of the internet age.

In an amicus brief filed Wednesday in Harper v. O’Donnell, the crypto exchange urged the Court to reconsider the “third-party doctrine” as it applies to digital financial data.

In 2020, James Harper, a Coinbase user, filed a lawsuit against the IRS, alleging the agency unlawfully obtained information that revealed his identity as a cryptocurrency holder.

Challenge to decades-old legal standard

The third-party doctrine—established through rulings in the 1970s—holds that individuals forfeit their expectation of privacy over data shared with third parties, such as banks or phone companies.

Coinbase argues that this principle, when applied to blockchain and digital assets, grants government agencies sweeping surveillance capabilities without the judicial oversight typically required for such intrusions.

While Coinbase is not a direct party to the case, the company has a vested interest in how the Court interprets privacy protections in the context of financial data stored or processed on its platform.

IRS use of broad summons under scrutiny

The case centers on the Internal Revenue Service’s use of a “John Doe” summons, which allows investigators to compel third parties to disclose data on unnamed individuals.

In 2016, the IRS served such a summons on Coinbase, requesting user data on more than 14,000 customers as part of an effort to identify individuals potentially underreporting crypto gains.

Similar summonses were later issued to Kraken and Circle in 2021.

Unlike traditional summonses, John Doe requests are not tied to specific individuals, but rather seek data on broad swaths of users.

Coinbase contends that this investigative tool, when used in the digital asset space, effectively gives the IRS a “real-time monitor” over user transactions.

Privacy in the Blockchain era

In its brief, Coinbase highlighted the unique characteristics of blockchain technology, which allows observers to trace past and future transactions tied to a wallet address.

This level of visibility, the company argues, amounts to what it calls a “financial ankle monitor.” The brief draws comparisons to Carpenter v. United States (2018), a case in which the Supreme Court ruled that obtaining historical cell phone location data without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.

Coinbase contends that the IRS’s ability to reconstruct years of blockchain activity is even more intrusive.

“Exposure of a person’s identity on the blockchain opens a potentially wide window into that person’s financial activity,” the company said, warning of the implications for user privacy and financial freedom.

The Supreme Court is expected to decide later this year whether to hear the case. If accepted, oral arguments would likely be scheduled for the next term.

Coinbase executives, including CEO Brian Armstrong and Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, have consistently advocated for updated legal frameworks that reflect the evolving nature of digital finance.

The post Coinbase urges US Supreme Court to rethink digital privacy doctrine appeared first on CoinJournal.