Monat: Dezember 2025

• Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson says Genesis ADA was profit earned from early work.
• He rejects calls to use those funds for new integrations or community needs.
• Treasury, not Genesis ADA, should finance current ecosystem initiatives.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has moved to clarify one of the blockchain’s longest-running disputes, reaffirming that the platform’s early Genesis ADA allocations were private earnings for foundational work and risk and not community-owned funds waiting to be spent.

Hoskinson’s remarks came during a November 30 livestream titled “Genesis ADA,” where he called the matter “closed” and warned against rewriting the project’s original terms.

Calls to redirect Genesis ADA toward integrations

Hoskinson said renewed calls to redirect Genesis ADA toward recent integrations misrepresent how the project was structured from the beginning.

He explained that the allocation given to Input Output (IO) and EMURGO followed a straightforward premise: these were profits tied to early risk, not contributions to a public treasury.

At the time of the Japanese crowd sale that funded Cardano, IO’s portion was worth around $8 million.

Hoskinson emphasised that this funding model was understood by all parties involved, stating that early contributors accepted deep regulatory, technical, and financial risk at a stage when failure was far more likely than success.

He noted that most cryptocurrency ventures collapse, yet Cardano not only survived but grew into a network valued in the tens of billions.

From that perspective, the Cardano founder argued that the founding entities’ profits were earned rather than taken from any community allocation.

He criticised what he called a “Twitter mob” mentality that surfaced whenever Genesis ADA reentered public debate.

He said the claim that early contributors do not deserve their allocation ignores the enormity of the risk they assumed and the substantial ecosystem they helped build.

He pointed to the initial capital provided by Japanese buyers and stressed that those early stakeholders have long been “made whole” under the terms originally agreed upon.

Why the issue reemerged

The latest wave of concern stems from a joint request for 70 million ADA from the on-chain treasury to fund integrations with major providers, including oracle networks and stablecoin issuers.

Some community members argued that Genesis ADA should cover those costs.

But Hoskinson dismissed the idea, noting that many of today’s integration partners did not exist when Genesis ADA was allocated, making the expectation retroactive and unreasonable.

He added that the requested treasury funds would not cover all expenses, and entities such as IO and the Midnight Foundation would contribute additional support because they hold significant positions in ADA and KNIGHT.

For the founder, the real debate is not about Genesis ADA but about how the ecosystem should evolve as Cardano prepares for a major strategic reset in 2026.

Shift toward a new Cardano governance layer

Hoskinson described this upcoming shift as a move from the original tripartite structure, IO, EMURGO, and the Cardano Foundation, to a more coordinated five-member executive layer.

The expanded group would include the Midnight Foundation and Intersect.

According to Hoskinson, this structure is needed to face a competitive landscape dominated by large and aggressive industry players, where a unified strategy is essential for securing key deals.

He also rejected the suggestion that IO or EMURGO should act as public utilities with balance sheets open for community direction.

As private companies, he said, their financial operations are not subject to community oversight.

Their commitment is limited to the work they promise and deliver.

Hoskinson ended the livestream by urging the community to move forward. He said the outcome of Genesis ADA is settled and cannot be revisited.

The task now, he said, is to decide whether the ecosystem should adopt the proposed 2026 framework and invest in the infrastructure needed for Cardano’s next phase of growth.

The post Cardano founder: Genesis ADA funds were earned profit, not community treasury appeared first on CoinJournal.

• MAS expands Ripple’s payment permissions for XRP and RLUSD services.
• The approval boosts Ripple’s role in fast, regulated APAC cross-border payments.
• Regional digital asset activity rises as Ripple deepens Singapore investment.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has approved an expanded range of payment activities for Ripple Markets APAC, the company’s local subsidiary.

This approval allows Ripple to grow its regulated payment services for banks, fintechs, and corporates in one of the world’s most tightly supervised financial markets.

Ripple can now offer a wider suite of digital payment token services linked to XRP and RLUSD.

It also gives the firm more room to deliver cross-border payment solutions that rely on digital assets to settle transactions faster and at a lower cost.

Ripple’s leaders say this development reflects the value of Singapore’s clear regulatory stance.

President Monica Long described MAS as a global benchmark for transparency and stable rules.

She said the decision strengthens Ripple’s plan to deepen its investment in the market and build infrastructure that supports faster global money movement.

MAS’s frameworks under the Payment Services Act give digital asset firms defined rules covering token issuance, custody, and payments.

Expansion aligned with rising APAC demand

The approval marks a surge in digital asset activity in the Asia-Pacific region, with a year-over-year increase of about 70%.

Ripple says Singapore sits at the centre of this growth thanks to its advanced policies and its early embrace of regulated digital token services.

Fiona Murray, Ripple’s Vice President and Managing Director for the region, said the expanded license equips the company to serve the institutions driving that growth.

She noted that regulated payment rails remain essential as cross-border activity accelerates across regional markets.

Ripple first established its Asia-Pacific headquarters in Singapore in 2017.

The company later secured a full MPI license, placing it among a select group of blockchain-focused firms approved to provide digital token services in the country.

Broader capabilities for institutional clients

With the updated permissions, Ripple can now support end-to-end payment flows through a single integration.

This includes collection, holding, token swaps, and payouts.

The system enables clients to avoid multiple infrastructure partners and reduces their reliance on additional banking relationships.

Ripple Payments, the company’s global solution, merges digital tokens with a payout network that handles conversion, compliance, and settlement operations.

By absorbing the technical and blockchain complexity, Ripple enables institutions to offer digital payment services more efficiently.

The company’s stablecoin, RLUSD, sits at the core of several of these services.

The stablecoin recently received recognition in Abu Dhabi as an Accepted Fiat-Referenced Token, allowing licensed firms in the Abu Dhabi Global Market to use it for regulated financial activities.

This adds momentum to Ripple’s broader expansion across the UAE and Asia.

The post Singapore’s MAS grants Ripple wider payment permissions as APAC demand surges appeared first on CoinJournal.

• HashKey moves closer to IPO after clearing Hong Kong listing hearing, boosting regulated crypto ambitions.
• HashKey leads Hong Kong’s licensed crypto trade but remains unprofitable despite a large client asset base.
• Firm expands globally with approvals in Dubai, Bermuda, and Ireland ahead of planned public listing.

Hong Kong’s push to build a tightly regulated digital asset market has taken another step as HashKey Holdings secures approval to move forward with an initial public offering.

The operator of the city’s largest licensed crypto exchange confirmed in a Dec. 1 disclosure that it cleared the Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s listing hearing, a milestone that positions the company to advance its plans.

The development arrives as Hong Kong continues to present itself as a controlled and legally defined alternative to the crypto restrictions on the mainland, while seeking to attract institutional and retail participation through licensed platforms.

IPO progress strengthens regulated market ambitions

HashKey has not revealed the size or timing of the IPO, but earlier reports in October indicated that the company had explored raising to $500 million.

The filing shows that JPMorgan Chase, Guotai Haitong Securities, and Guotai Junan International are acting as joint sponsors, reinforcing the city’s intention to anchor crypto activity within traditional financial structures.

Local media reported that funds raised through the offering would be directed toward technology upgrades, wider product development, stronger operational capacity, and the expansion of services into new markets.

HashKey is also prioritising the improvement of its risk management systems as part of a broader plan for long-term growth.

Licensing gives HashKey a strategic foothold

HashKey operates under the Securities and Futures Commission’s regulatory framework and was among the first digital asset companies approved to serve both institutional and retail investors under Hong Kong’s updated licensing regime.

The company holds a Type 1 licence, permitting it to deal in securities that include tokenised versions of assets categorised as securities.

It also holds a Type 7 licence, which allows it to run an automated trading platform.

Alongside this, HashKey’s asset management arm is licensed to manage portfolios consisting of up to 100 percent virtual assets.

It is one of 11 licensed virtual asset trading platforms serving retail users in Hong Kong.

This stands in contrast to mainland China, where crypto activity remains banned, highlighting Hong Kong’s continued position as a regulated gateway within the region.

Market share grows but losses persist

According to the filing, HashKey handled more than three quarters of the region’s onshore digital asset trading volume in 2024. It also held nearly HK$20 billion (US$2.56 billion) in client assets, underscoring its dominance within Hong Kong’s regulated crypto landscape.

Despite its scale, the company remains unprofitable. HashKey recorded a net loss of HK$506 million in the first half of 2025, though this represented an improvement from the HK$777 million loss logged during the same period a year earlier.

The filing noted that performance has shifted in line with market volatility, which continues to shape activity across the sector.

HashKey has been working to expand its presence through investment initiatives, including the launch of a $500 million perpetual fund focused on institutional participation in digital asset treasury projects.

The fund aims to support blockchain ecosystems such as Ethereum and seeks to contribute to long term adoption and capital movement.

Global approvals broaden HashKey’s reach

In addition to its Hong Kong operations, HashKey has extended its regulatory footprint in 2025 by securing conditional approval to operate in Dubai.

It has also obtained regulatory permissions to run licensed platforms in Bermuda and Ireland, signalling an effort to widen its global relevance ahead of its public listing.

These gains support Hong Kong’s attempt to reinforce its position as a regulated crypto centre and highlight how the city is using licensed actors to shape a defined market structure for digital assets.

The post Hong Kong tightens crypto grip as HashKey clears path to IPO appeared first on CoinJournal.

• The new legislation builds on the Digital Asset Basic Act by adding detailed rules for stablecoin oversight.
• The framework outlines how global stablecoins like USDT and USDC will be treated in Korea.
• Officials warn delays could leave Korea behind other regions that tightened rules in 2025.

South Korea is taking a major step toward formalising how won-based stablecoins will be issued and supervised, after lawmakers settled a long-running dispute over who should control the process.

A closed-door meeting brought clarity to the core question of authority, with policymakers agreeing that banks should lead the effort while still allowing tech firms to participate.

The move comes at a time when crypto adoption is rising among people aged 20 to 50, and when global players continue to dominate stablecoin markets.

With a December deadline approaching, officials want to finalise a structure that supports innovation but keeps monetary stability at the centre of regulation.

Consortium model defines the role of banks and tech firms

A Dec. 1 report by Maeli Business Newspaper said lawmakers agreed on a consortium model where banks maintain majority control of stablecoin-issuing entities.

Tech companies will still be able to participate, but financial institutions will take the lead to reduce systemic risks.

The goal is to create a Korean-style stablecoin framework that mirrors the safeguards of traditional finance, with clear rules governing reserves, issuance, and supervision.

The model was designed to align with the Bank of Korea’s concerns about protecting the money supply.

It also provides a common structure for private companies, reducing the risk of fragmented products entering the market without consistent stability mechanisms.

By setting shared standards early, policymakers hope to shape a domestic stablecoin ecosystem that can support innovation without compromising financial security.

Government faces Dec. 10 deadline for its proposal

Senior Democratic Party lawmaker Kang Joon-hyun said the government must submit its proposal by Dec. 10. If it misses the deadline, lawmakers will move ahead with their own version of the bill.

The aim is to pass the legislation during the National Assembly’s January extraordinary session, after consultation with the ruling People Power Party and the president’s office.

This new act expands on the Digital Asset Basic Act passed earlier this year.

That earlier law established licensing rules for issuers, requirements for reserve protection, and compliance obligations for virtual asset service providers.

The upcoming bill fills in the remaining regulatory gaps by specifying how stablecoins should be managed when they operate like traditional financial instruments.

It also provides clearer guidance for US-based stablecoins such as USDT and USDC, which have become increasingly influential in Korea’s growing digital asset market.

Push to match progress in global markets

Officials warn that delays could leave Korean companies trailing behind their global competitors.

The US, EU, and Japan strengthened their stablecoin rules in 2025, creating a more defined landscape for exchanges and financial institutions.

Korean regulators want to avoid losing momentum, especially as domestic interest in crypto continues to rise.

The updated framework aims to reduce uncertainty for developers, financial firms, and exchanges.

By bringing digital assets closer to mainstream financial oversight, authorities hope to support responsible growth and give consumers access to well-regulated products.

The focus is on keeping the domestic market aligned with international standards while maintaining space for private-sector innovation.

Lawmakers discuss wider reforms on security and markets

The meeting also covered planned updates to financial security and capital-market rules.

After recent hacking incidents at major financial companies, officials intend to revise the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Proposed changes include tougher penalties and stronger enforcement following cyber breaches.

Lawmakers are also working with opposition parties on a set of capital-market reforms.

These include rules that would require mandatory tender offers in certain corporate situations.

They also plan to update share-allocation standards so that everyday investors have fairer access to offerings.

The goal is to improve transparency and strengthen market integrity as Korea reshapes its financial regulatory environment.

The post South Korea moves to tighten stablecoin rules with a bank-led model appeared first on CoinJournal.