Monat: Dezember 2025

• Libeara developed the fund with FundBridge Capital for Singapore’s market.
• Standard Chartered is expanding digital-asset activity through SC Ventures.
• A separate physically backed gold fund was recently launched in Singapore.

Institutional investors in Singapore are being offered a new digital route into gold exposure as Standard Chartered broadens its presence in tokenised assets through Libeara’s MG 999 fund.

The product arrives during a period of rising demand for safe-haven assets, shaped by geopolitical tension, shifting currency expectations, and tariff moves under President Donald Trump.

The fund blends a synthetic link to gold prices with a lending feature designed for jewellery retailers in the city-state.

With interest in real-world asset tokenisation growing across global markets, MG 999 reflects how traditional financial groups are testing new digital structures without altering core investment themes.

The approach broadens investor access while encouraging further experimentation across evolving digital asset markets globally.

Tokenised access

Libeara developed the MG 999 fund with FundBridge Capital to give professional investors exposure to gold in the form of blockchain-based tokens.

Each token is designed to track the spot price of gold on Libeara’s ledger.

The fund removes the need for vaulting or transport but still aims to reflect market performance, creating a synthetic alternative to physical bullion.

FundBridge has described the structure as a way to connect regulated fund design with digital systems while keeping governance at the level expected for institutional products.

Institutional shift

The fund is open only to institutional and accredited investors. MG 999 is different from physical gold funds because it does not store metal.

Instead, it uses a token mechanism engineered to mirror market movement.

Standard Chartered’s involvement fits into broader expansion in Asia through SC Ventures, which also holds majority stakes in Zodia Custody and Zodia Markets.

These platforms focus on institutional digital-asset access, strengthening the bank’s position in real-world asset tokenisation as the sector gains momentum across treasuries, bonds, funds, and commodities.

Global demand conditions

The launch comes at a time when central banks have been increasing gold reserves. Market watchers have linked this trend to concerns about the long-term role of the US dollar and a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty.

Experts have also cited Trump’s tariff policies as a driver of interest in safe-haven assets.

Last month, Standard Chartered joined other firms in launching a physically backed gold product in Singapore.

In that fund, the bank acts as custodian for bullion stored at the Le Freeport facility near Changi Airport. That offering targets investors wanting allocated metal rather than tokenised exposure.

Jewellery market lending

MG 999 also includes a lending element tied to Singapore’s jewellery sector.

Mustafa Gold has been named as the first borrower. The structure lets the retailer use its jewellery inventory as collateral while keeping the pieces available for customers.

Libeara and FundBridge say this design shows how tokenisation can connect investment products with working-capital needs in traditional retail markets, expanding digital use cases beyond asset tracking alone.

The post Standard Chartered expands into tokenised gold with Libeara in Singapore appeared first on CoinJournal.

• Recent research shows Polymarket trades are double-counted on most public dashboards.
• The issue stems from redundant maker-taker events in smart contracts.
• According to the allegations, the actual volumes are roughly half of what dashboards report.

Polymarket, the prominent prediction market platform, is facing scrutiny after research by Storm Slivkoff suggested that the platform’s reported trading volumes may be systematically inflated across most public analytics dashboards.

The controversy has drawn attention from industry experts, data analysts, and market participants, raising questions about how trading activity is measured and reported in decentralised prediction markets.

Polymarket gives separate OrderFilled events for makers and takers

The research by Storm Slivkoff, a partner at Paradigm, which was later highlighted by Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang, has identified a technical discrepancy in Polymarket’s on-chain smart contract data.

According to Slivkoff, the platform emits separate OrderFilled events for both the maker and taker sides of each trade.

While each event is individually accurate, most public dashboards aggregate all events indiscriminately, effectively counting the same trade twice.

found a pretty major data bug

it turns out almost every major dashboard has been double-counting Polymarket volume (not related to wash trading)

this is because Polymarket’s onchain data contains redundant representations of each trade. receipts ⬇️⬇️ pic.twitter.com/rQJEzs2Rfl

— storm (@notnotstorm) December 8, 2025

A simple transaction demonstrates the problem. One trade of YES tokens for $4.13 generated two identical events for the same amount, which dashboards then summed to report $8.26 in trading volume.

Slivkoff noted that this bug affects both notional volume (the number of contracts traded) and cashflow volume (the dollar value exchanged), thereby inflating every trade’s representation.

Notably, the error is unrelated to wash trading and results purely from the way Polymarket’s contracts emit data.

Polymarket refutes the volume double-counting claims

Polymarket’s internal team quickly pushed back against the allegations, asserting that the official site reports taker-side volume without double-counting, in line with standard industry practices.

The platform has emphasised that the issue primarily impacts third-party dashboards, which rely on raw event data from smart contracts without implementing corrections for redundant entries.

Notably, several major data providers, including DefiLlama, Allium Labs, and Blockworks, have confirmed they are updating their dashboards to account for the discrepancy.

Some data providers have, however, defended current methodologies, noting that more sophisticated dashboards had accounted for the distinction since 2024 but had not formally documented their approach.

Other data providers have criticised Paradigm for potential bias, as the firm holds investments in Kalshi, a competing US-based prediction market.

The broader market implications

Beyond the immediate question of reported volume, the controversy underscores broader challenges in accurately measuring activity on prediction market platforms.

Low-priced contracts can create disproportionately large notional volumes relative to actual capital at risk, making traditional volume metrics potentially misleading.

Experts have suggested that metrics such as open interest and fee revenue may offer a clearer picture of platform activity.

The timing of the revelation is also notable, coinciding with Polymarket’s plans for a full US relaunch following CFTC regulatory approval and an anticipated valuation of $12 billion to $15 billion.

The platform is also exploring an internal market-making operation that could trade against customers, raising further scrutiny and comparison to competitors like Kalshi.

The post Polymarket accused of alleged double-counted volume in most public data appeared first on CoinJournal.