Crypto news today: Stablecoin bill stalls as democrats raise concerns about Trump’s personal crypto interests

  • Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Gallego, signaled opposition to advancing the current stablecoin (GENIUS Act) bill.
  • Concerns stem from President Trump’s increasing personal financial ties to crypto ventures (memecoin, family-linked stablecoin).
  • The legislative stall threatens not only the stablecoin bill but also progress on broader crypto market structure rules.

The path forward for landmark stablecoin legislation in the US Senate has hit a significant snag, as key Democratic lawmakers express reservations linked directly to President Donald Trump’s growing personal and financial connections within the cryptocurrency industry.

What was recently seen as a bipartisan effort now faces political headwinds, potentially delaying not only stablecoin rules but also broader market structure legislation for the digital asset sector.

Over the weekend, a group of nine Senate Democrats, led by Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona, signaled they would oppose advancing the current version of the main stablecoin bill, known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins of 2025 (GENIUS Act).

Their unified stance raises immediate procedural hurdles, as Senate rules typically require 60 votes to overcome filibusters and move legislation forward. Gallego, notably elected with substantial backing ($10 million) from the crypto-focused super PAC Fairshake, now leads the charge expressing concerns.

While the senators’ public statement cited the need for stronger provisions on critical issues like anti-money laundering, national security, and consumer protection, sources suggest deeper concerns related to President Trump’s potential personal financial gains from the crypto space are driving the hesitation.

In a report, CoinDesk confirmed that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had privately urged Democrats to withhold support during a caucus meeting last week, predating Gallego’s public announcement. Axios first reported this internal division.

Trump’s crypto ventures raise red flags

Two recent developments appear to have particularly crystallized Democratic concerns. First, President Trump announced plans for a dinner exclusively for top holders of his own branded memecoin.

Second, Abu Dhabi investment firm MGX announced its intention to utilize USD1 – a stablecoin associated with World Liberty Financial, a firm backed by the Trump family – for a significant investment into the cryptocurrency exchange Binance.

As USA Today noted, these ventures suggest Trump could personally profit to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars from activities potentially legitimized or facilitated by the proposed legislation.

President Trump, during a weekend interview on Meet the Press, denied seeking personal profit from his crypto initiatives.

“I’m not profiting from anything,” he asserted. “All I’m doing is, I started this long before the election. I want crypto. I think crypto’s important because if we don’t do it, China’s going to… But I want crypto because a lot of people, you know millions of people want it.”

Legislative momentum hits a wall

This emerging conflict threatens to derail the momentum not only for the stablecoin bill but also for much-anticipated market structure legislation.

Industry stakeholders have long sought clarity on how the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should oversee the broader digital asset market.

One individual working closely with lawmakers told CoinDesk that while the stablecoin bill might eventually pass, the current delay could jeopardize its progress, which in turn would almost certainly stall any movement on the more comprehensive market structure bill.

Concerns about the potential duration of this legislative slowdown and what concessions might be needed to appease Democrats are growing.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee and a prominent crypto skeptic, was unequivocal. Referring to the MGX deal involving the Trump family-linked stablecoin (publicly shared by Eric Trump), she posted on Bluesky that the Senate should reject any bill that would “facilitate this kind of corruption.”

Warren, along with Senator Jeffrey Merkley, subsequently sent a letter Monday urging the U.S. Office of Government Ethics to investigate the MGX transaction.

The resistance isn’t confined to the Senate. Representative Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, informed the committee’s chair on Monday that she would block efforts to hold a joint hearing with the House Agriculture Committee aimed at addressing market structure legislation.

Politics vs. policy: industry urges action

Financial policy analyst Jaret Seiberg of TD Cowen characterized much of the current impasse as “politics.”

In a note to clients, he observed that Trump’s personal stake makes it politically difficult for Democrats to support legislation regulating his family’s interests.

Despite this, Seiberg predicts the stablecoin bill will likely still pass the Senate eventually, albeit perhaps not this week, given the crypto industry’s significant lobbying power and resources.

“It is hard for us to see why the Democrats would take on that fight when they can leverage significant concessions from the GOP on the stablecoin bill,” he reasoned.

The crypto industry itself appears alarmed by the sudden halt in momentum.

A joint statement released Monday by leaders of the Blockchain Association, the Crypto Council for Innovation, and the Digital Chamber urged Senators to proceed with debate on the GENIUS Act, arguing a clear regulatory framework is vital for stablecoin adoption and maintaining “dollar dominance in the digital economy.”

The National Venture Capital Association echoed this call, emphasizing the need for clear rules to foster innovation and support US leadership in financial technology.

While the senators withholding support stated they “recognize that the absence of regulation leaves consumers unprotected,” their current stance, driven by concerns over presidential conflicts of interest, has undeniably pumped the brakes on crypto legislation in Washington.

The post Crypto news today: Stablecoin bill stalls as democrats raise concerns about Trump’s personal crypto interests appeared first on CoinJournal.

Trump woos crypto elite with exclusive dinners tied to $TRUMP token and millionaire donors

US President Donald Trump is leaning into the cryptocurrency world this month with two high-profile dinners targeting both wealthy political donors and holders of the meme coin bearing his name — the $TRUMP token.

Together, these crypto-focused events could generate millions in support and further entrench Trump’s growing ties to the digital asset community.

The first event, scheduled for May 6, is a lavish $1.5 million-per-plate fundraiser, placing it among the most expensive dinners in American presidential history.

The event is hosted by MAGA Inc. and includes special guest David Sacks, a prominent venture capitalist and a vocal advocate for reshaping crypto and AI regulations in the US.

Later in the month, on May 22, Trump will host a second dinner at his private club, Trump National in the Washington, D.C. area.

Uniquely, this one isn’t funded by cash but by crypto.

Access to the gala is being determined through a blockchain-based leaderboard contest, run by the creators of the $TRUMP meme coin.

Entry is granted to the top 220 token holders by May 12, with the top 25 getting VIP access and a private reception, along with a black-tie-optional “WIP White House Tour.”

This gamified campaign tactic has driven significant attention and value to the $TRUMP token.

Since the announcement of the gala dinner, the token surged over 50%, lifting the on-paper value of wallets held by early backers and project insiders.

However, the setup has sparked controversy.

Watchdog group Accountable slammed the contest as “the most nakedly corrupt self-enrichment scheme in US presidential history,” citing concerns over how it potentially enables wealthy, and possibly foreign, individuals to buy influence through crypto holdings.

Adding to the criticism, the contest’s fine print includes a disclaimer that Trump’s attendance is not guaranteed, and that in the event of cancellation, winners will receive a Trump-themed NFT instead.

According to on-chain analytics firm Chainalysis, trading activity in the $TRUMP token has generated over $324 million in transaction fees since its January launch — funds largely routed to wallets controlled by the token’s creators and, reportedly, Trump-affiliated entities.

The project’s website claims that about 80% of the token’s supply is held by the Trump Organization and associated wallets.

To ease public scrutiny, the coin’s insiders have agreed not to sell their holdings for at least another 90 days, according to disclosures on the project site.

The post Trump woos crypto elite with exclusive dinners tied to $TRUMP token and millionaire donors appeared first on CoinJournal.

Can MANTRA (OM) price rebound as RSI dips below 20?

  • The Mantra (OM) token has fallen below $0.40, with RSI at 17.18, signalling oversold conditions.
  • 300M OM tokens are scheduled for burning to curb supply, but price recovery remains elusive.
  • The Mantra team also plans governance reforms to restore trust, though volatility persists.

The Mantra protocol’s native token, OM, has plunged below $0.40, igniting speculation about a potential rebound as its Relative Strength Index (RSI) drops to an oversold level of 17.18.

This steep decline follows a dramatic crash in April 2025, erasing billions in market capitalisation and shaking investor confidence.

With technical indicators flashing extreme bearish signals and the MANTRA team implementing token burns and governance reforms, the question looms: can OM recover, or is further downside inevitable?

A catastrophic OM token crash and lingering fallout

On April 13, 2025, MANTRA’s OM token plummeted from $6.30 to $0.37 in mere hours.

The collapse slashed the project’s market capitalisation from $6 billion to under $700 million.

Attributed to forced liquidations during low-liquidity weekend trading, the crash sparked rumours of exchange involvement, which the team swiftly denied.

CEO John Mullin released on-chain data to counter claims of insider selling, confirming that team-held tokens remained locked.

In response to the crisis, MANTRA’s leadership took decisive action to curb selling pressure.

CEO John Mullin burned 150 million staked OM tokens from the team’s allocation on April 29, 2025.

An additional 150 million tokens from ecosystem partners are slated for destruction, totalling 300 million OM—roughly 16.5% of the total supply.

This significant reduction aims to tighten supply and bolster investor confidence.

However, the market has yet to respond, with OM lingering below key technical thresholds, suggesting scepticism persists.

Beyond token burns, MANTRA’s team is pursuing structural changes to rebuild trust.

Plans for decentralising validators and upgrading governance aim to enhance the protocol’s resilience and transparency.

These initiatives, while promising, require time to materialise and may not immediately impact price action.

Despite these efforts, investor trust remains fragile, with OM struggling to regain footing.

Market participants remain cautious, with volatility dominating OM’s short-term outlook.

The success of the introduced reforms could determine whether MANTRA regains its former stature or continues to falter.

Technical indicators show the OM token is in an oversold region

From a technical analysis point of view, MANTRA’s price now sits well below its 20-day EMA of $0.51 and 50-day EMA of $0.74, underscoring a pronounced bearish trend.

However, the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI), at 17.01, marks one of the lowest levels since the April crash, indicating extreme oversold conditions.

Historically, RSI readings below 20 often precede relief rallies, as buyers capitalise on perceived undervaluation.

In addition, the MACD has turned bullish with a crossover and the histogram moving above the zero line.

Mantra price chart
Mantra price chart by TradingView

If buying momentum emerges, OM could target the $0.42 resistance, with a break above $0.54 signalling stronger bullish confirmation.

Conversely, failure to hold the $0.37 support risks a slide to $0.30, potentially deepening panic selling.

Can Mantra price stage a comeback?

The convergence of an oversold RSI, significant token burns, and planned protocol upgrades creates a complex outlook for MANTRA.

While technical indicators hint at a possible relief bounce, sustained recovery hinges on restored investor confidence.

The $0.42–$0.54 price range will be critical for bulls to reclaim, while a drop below $0.37 could intensify bearish sentiment.

As MANTRA navigates this turbulent period, its ability to execute on promised reforms and stabilise price action will shape its path forward.

For now, traders watch closely, weighing the potential for a rebound against the risk of further declines.

The post Can MANTRA (OM) price rebound as RSI dips below 20? appeared first on CoinJournal.